Example Persuasive Paper on the Death Penalty Introduction Death penalty has been an inalienable part of human society and its legal system for centuries, regarded as a necessary deterrent to dangerous crimes and a way to liberate the community from dangerous criminals. However, later on this type of punishment came to be regarded as a crime against humanistic ideals by many, and its validity in the legal system has been questioned. Until now, the debate rages on. This resulted in a wide discrepancy of laws on this issue.
Example Persuasive Paper on the Death Penalty Introduction Death penalty has been an inalienable part of human society and its legal system for centuries, regarded as a necessary deterrent to dangerous crimes and a way to liberate the community from dangerous criminals.
However, later on this type of punishment came to be regarded as a crime against humanistic ideals by many, and its validity in the legal system has been questioned. Until now, the debate rages on. This resulted in a wide discrepancy of laws on this issue. Some nations including China, the US, Iran, Belarus, and others preserve the death penalty as an option, while others like Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and almost all European nations have abolished capital punishment.
Still others keep the norm in their legislations, but have de facto suspended execution of criminals sentenced to capital punishment. This paper will seek to prove that death penalty has to be preserved as a valid means of prevention serious crimes.
It will examine the effect of death penalty on society and its relevance to the protection of interests of common citizens.
Background The history of death penalty is almost as old as the history of mankind. Various means of capital punishment involved burning, hanging, drowning, crucifixion, breaking on the will, boiling to death, electrocution, firing squad, gassing - the list can be continued.
The choice of a particular method in Europe in the Middle Age, for instance, depended on the social status of the condemned. Painless and respectable ways were reserved for the aristocracy; and more painful for the common people, such as hanging or breaking on the wheel.
In other cases, the choice of the method was warranted by the time of crime: The French Revolution introduced a more humane execution method, the guillotine that cut off the heads of the condemned.
The duke cancelled the penalty and ordered to destroy all the instruments of murder in his nation after being influenced by the book the Italian Cesare Beccaria Dei Delitti e Delle Pene "On Crimes and Punishments". The anniversary of the decree is since celebrated as a holiday in Tuscany.
Inas reports Amnesty International, 3, people in 25 nations were executed. China accounts for the bulk of these executions - 3, cases.
Kuwait is the leader in the number of executions perresidents - compared to in China and in Iran, the runner-up on the total number, Wikipedia.
In most nations, death penalty is used to punish criminals for war crimes or serious crimes associated with physical injury. In Asia Vietnam, Malaysia, Thailand it is used to punish for drug-related crimes, even though these crimes are mot related to physical injury. As part of anti-death penalty movement, this call to repeal this measure has been upheld by various international organizations.
Some international conventions such as the Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and the Sixth Protocol to the European Convention on Human Rights have been adopted, although they only bind nations that have ratified them.
Organizations like the European Union demand from new members the abolition of death penalty as a condition of entry. Thus, there is a significant pressure on nations to cancel it.
Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch are two prominent organisations fighting against death penalty.
The issues involved in the discussion of death penalty usually focus around two main parts. First, this punishment is analysed from a purely utilitarian perspective in an effort to find out whether application of capital punishment really helps to deter crime and reduce the risk of recidivism, when criminals commit repeated crimes.
The evidence for this is sought in crime rates in regions and nations where executions are carried out. Second, supporters or opponents of death penalty need to find out whether this penalty can be acknowledged on moral grounds, solving the problem of whether human beings are justified in killing other human beings.
Although the arguments stated remain basically the same throughout history of the discussion, evidence can vary, and the findings, although controversial, can tilt the public opinion to one or the other side.
Thus, the support for death penalty surges in nations where especially outrageous murders take place.Example Research Paper on Death Penalty In recent years the death penalty has been a topic of heated debate and controversy.
The purpose behind it to some seems unclear, while to others it seems as a blatantly obvious solution to violent crime. Example Persuasive Paper on the Death Penalty Introduction Death penalty has been an inalienable part of human society and its legal system for centuries, regarded as a necessary deterrent to dangerous crimes and a way to liberate the community from dangerous criminals.
Death Penalty in Canada - Canada as a country is always in constant change. Whether it is in government, physicality, entertainment, or economy, Canada is a nation that prides on being unique and receptive to change. Death penalty is a controversial capital punishment which is given against a crime usually involving murder.
It is controversial because many people support it and many people condemn it. It is a big ongoing controversial societal issue in United States, Europe and other parts of the world. Death Penalty Position Paper Essays: Over , Death Penalty Position Paper Essays, Death Penalty Position Paper Term Papers, Death Penalty Position Paper Research Paper, Book Reports.
ESSAYS, term and research papers available for UNLIMITED access you can always order custom written paper which will be written . My position on this is to implement a life in prison without parole sentence rather that the current death sentence.
Numbers do not lie on the cost effectiveness of this. The cost to impose the maximum penalty of lifetime incarceration instead of the death penalty is. 08% of the current death penalty costs in one state alone.